Massachusetts Lottery May Soon Offer DFS. Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, who has drafted a framework for the regulation of DFS into the Bay State.

Massach<span id="more-5142"></span>usetts Lottery May Soon Offer DFS. Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, who has drafted a framework for the regulation of DFS into the Bay State.

The Massachusetts Lottery Commission is proposing modernization that is sweeping and it has formally stated its intent to adopt online ticket product sales, in addition to offering its very own daily fantasy sports and social video gaming services and products.

Massachusetts happens to be making noises about adopting a comprehensive online gaming package for some time, since it seeks to complement its emergent land-based casino industry and successful lottery product with an even more up-to-date and competitive offering that is online.

While Internet casino video gaming and poker would require a huge upheaval that is legislative DFS and social gaming would not ( at the least in the Bay State), and it’s clear that Massachusetts is intent on creating its very own fantasy recreations item as a means appealing to the younger generation that eschews traditional draws, scratch cards and keno in favor of newer, mobile-friendly styles.

Formal Invite

As such, hawaii has launched a formal request for information (RFI), inviting companies to submit ‘proposals for the development, implementation, operational support, and maintenance of a Massachusetts Lottery iLottery System,’ read a statement that is official.

This will include ‘the development and integration of digital versions of existing and lottery that is new, including but not restricted to social gaming and daily fantasy recreations choices.’

Of particular interest to the Lottery Commission are player authentication and registration protocols, aswell as best practices for responsible gaming controls.

The commission also states that it’s looking for ways of integrating lottery ticket retailers so that you can protect the 7,500-odd businesses that are small rely on lottery sales commissions.

Homegrown Product

‘We think the introduction of a fantasy activities platform at Massachusetts Lottery would help to embrace a market that is emerging continuing to protect our retail partners,’ Lottery Executive Director Michael Sweeney told the News provider recently.

‘ This particular variety of game would perhaps not cannibalize our existing products. It would obviously be a product that is new. It might help us to activate that which we would refer to as a ‘next-generation’ player and hopefully it would also help Lottery generate a new revenue source as opposed to eroding or maintaining existing offers.’

Across the border in New York State, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has been railing up against the ‘fraudulent’ nature for the DFS industry, but Massachusetts’ AG Maura Healey has declared that we now have no federal or state laws and regulations that preclude such sites from running.

Healy has proposed full regulation of DFS, drawing up protocols to protect customers, and has stated that state residents who perform DFS should ‘not be concerned’ that they are breaking the law.

After all, there’s nothing incorrect with embracing just a little local innovation, and DraftKings, created and bred in Boston, is possibly benefitting from being fully a homegrown success story.

India Supreme Court Panel Recommends Legalizing Sports Betting

Previous India Supreme Court Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha is recommending that the national nation legalize cricket betting and gambling in order to crackdown on corruption. (Image: The Hindu)

Asia is one step closer to legalizing recreations betting and gambling after a panel appointed by the country’s Supreme Court recommended modifying the gaming that is longstanding in order to combat a growing epidemic of illegal wagering.

Home to over 1.2 billion people, India is the second-most country that is populated the globe.

Now three lawmakers, previous Chief Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha, along with retired Justices Ashok Bhan and RV Raveendran, opined to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) that legalized activities gambling would provide more transparency and reduce rogue backdoor wagering.

‘It [betting] would serve both the game and economy if legalized,’ Lodha told club player casino free chip reporters on Monday, adding that the market must certanly be opened, but only with extensive safeguards in position to ensure players and those with direct ties to recreations matches are banned from participating.

2013 Scandal

Last January, India’s Supreme Court formed the panel, with Lodha serving as president, in response to the 2013 Indian Premier League match-fixing scandal that rocked the sport and dominated headlines.

Though the sport of cricket is no stranger to debate, the events of 2013 had been unprecedented.

The investigation that is lengthy Delhi Police led to charges against 39 individuals and two-year suspensions for the Rajasthan Royals and Chennai Super Kings cricket teams.

The extensive match-fixing and illegal betting led the BCCI to make a plan to enhance its infrastructure and look for techniques to mend its moral standing.

The criminal acts also triggered intervention by the Supreme Court and Lodha’s panel concluding that BCCI and India should embrace a controlled gambling market to eliminate illegal betting systems and properly monitor players and officials.

BCCI Unlikely to Embrace New Vision

Cricket is probably the most popular activity in India, and while the game’s governing body claims it wants to completely clean its league up, the federal government might not be so wanting to ending gambling prohibition.

Apart from horse racing, gambling in Asia was illegal for nearly 150 years.

In addition to proposing legal cricket gambling, Lodha’s outline also suggests changing the BCCI’s energy framework and organization from top to bottom. The BCCI has remained mum on the Lodha report up to now.

The decision to authorize gaming and activities betting doesn’t reside with the BCCI; that task goes to officials on their state and federal levels.

‘ The federal government will likely leave it alone since it is still a contentious issue,’ India Bet Managing Director George Oborne told eGaming Review.

Gambling has largely been a states’ liberties topic over the full years, but of the nation’s 29 states and seven territories, just three have taken actions to expand the industry: Goa, Daman, and Sikkim.

Though gambling can provide revenues that are substantial monies for local governments, numerous in Asia believe any expansion of gambling also leads to an expansion in crime, corruption, and money laundering.

Lodha argues gambling’s currently there, albeit illegally, and that swift action must be taken.

‘With big cash and attention, there has not been the necessary caution to protect the sport and its particular players from the orgy of excess,’ he said.

Second PokerStars Boycott Struggles to Make Impact After First Effort Fizzled

Ike Haxton, whom resigned on New Year’s Day as a PokerStars professional in protest at the changes to the VIP system. (Image: pokerstars.com)

A second PokerStars boycott by high-stakes and high-variance players is apparently failing woefully to make a discernible dent, at least on the internet site’s traffic numbers.

Around 1,600 players signed up for the protest, according to organizers.

The previous week, while Sunday, January 3rd remained on par with figures from the same day the previous week per industry number-cruncher PokerScout.com, while traffic dipped on January 1st, the first day of the strike, it actually rose on January 2nd, in comparison with the same day.

Of course, it’s impossible to know just how much the sudden dearth of high stakes players has effects on PokerStars’ daily rake, and whether all the players who pledged to sit out have in truth proved real to their word.

The boycott, which is due to finish Thursday, January 7th, has been organized by a number of groups WeArePokerPlayers.com that is including and.com, also a number of high-profile, high stakes players on the 2+2 forums, in protest towards a major overhaul to the VIP system, which took impact on January 1st.

PokerStars announced in November that these changes would include scrapping Supernova Elite rewards for 2016, despite the achievement with this status being a process that is two-year.

Boycott Backfired?

PokerStars claims that the changes are created to improve the poker ecology, however they leave high-stakes, high-volume players high and dry.

While these players represent some of the website’s avid that is most, long-term, and high-ranking players, they are generally net-withdrawing players as opposed to the hordes of net-depositors that the online poker giant is anxious to attract.

The boycott that is first place between December 1st and 3rd, with 2,600 players joining in the sit out. But that event clashed with the PokerStars Christmas Festival, so traffic numbers remained similar, except that those high-stakes players were changed with lower stakes players attracted by low buy-ins and jackpot prizes.

While PokerStars is probable to have raked less throughout that period, it declared itself vindicated by the boycott december.

‘During the three-day boycott we recorded the healthiest consecutive three-day ecosystem link between the season with steady net gaming revenue, despite the fact that our net-depositing players lost at a much lower rate than they’ve all 12 months,’ wrote Eric Hollreiser, VP of Communications for PokerStars and Amaya.

More Boycotts Planned

The players that are affected undeterred, nevertheless, and are determined showing PokerStars that they can make the operator’s life hard.

And much more boycotts are planned within the future. WeArePokerPlayers.com has launched a campaign searching for 5,000 signatures to accept at the least a strike that is month-long while other protestors have recommended that a 10,000-player boycott could reduce PokerStars’ rake by just as much as 30 %.

On New Year’s Day, Ike Haxton became the second pokerStars that are high-profile to resign in disgust at the modifications, after the exemplory case of Alex Millar, who severed ties because of the site right before the holiday duration.

‘As a four time Supernova Elite, I am aware what it requires to rake 1M VPP in a ‘ wrote haxton on 2+2 year. ‘It’s a grind that is tough. For some of the players that do it, it is a commitment that is all-consuming intense than most full time jobs.

‘Many of those have actually relocated far from their homes and families to pursue it,’ he added. ‘Finding out, just as you expected them to be is brutal as you approach the finish line, that your efforts will not be rewarded. We cannot in good conscience carry on to endorse a poker site that treats its players this real way.’